区别于普通民事合同,行政协议中的行政机关占据行政协议的主导地位。为了防止行政机关滥用权利,法院有必要对行政主体的单方变更解除权进行司法审查。目前我国对于单方变更解除行政协议的司法审查不够完善,存在适用依据不清晰、认定标准不统一、补偿标准不明确等问题。基于现行法律体系对该权利规制现状,本文依据相关法律规范、判例探讨行政协议中行政机关单方变更解除权的行使规则,以期为完善审查单方变更解除权案件的法律适用、审查行政机关行使权利条件和对相对人的补偿提供思路。Different from the ordinary civil contract, the administrative organ in the administrative agreement occupies the dominant position of the administrative agreement. In order to prevent the administrative organs from abusing their rights, it is necessary for the court to conduct judicial review on the unilateral modification and rescission of the administrative subject. At present, the judicial review of unilateral modification and termination of administrative agreements in China is not perfect, and there are some problems such as unclear application basis, inconsistent identification standards, and unclear compensation standards. Based on the current legal system’s regulation status of this right, this paper discusses the exercise rules of the unilateral modification and rescission right of the administrative organ in the administrative agreement according to relevant legal norms and precedents, in order to provide ideas for improving the application of law in the review of unilateral modification and rescission right cases, reviewing the conditions for the exercise of the right of the administrative organ and compensating the counterparty.
行政协议反向诉讼之容许性探析,通过剖析行政协议反向诉讼的理论基础,揭示其内涵与特征,明确其在行政法律关系中的定位。同时,详细分析构建行政协议反向诉讼面临的现实困境,包括行政协议识别难题、传统诉讼理念束缚以及非诉执行机制制约等。进而提出突破困境的路径,如明确行政协议认定标准、转变诉讼理念、优化非诉执行机制等。在此基础上,进一步阐述行政协议反向诉讼的制度构建与程序设计,包括诉讼主体资格确定、诉讼程序运行、证据规则与举证责任分配等方面。最后,探讨保障行政协议反向诉讼制度有效实施的措施,强调加强司法能力建设、强化监督制约机制以及推动行政机关依法行政的重要性。通过全面系统的研究,为行政协议反向诉讼制度的构建与完善提供理论支持与实践参考。An Analysis of the Permissibility of Reverse Litigation on Administrative Agreements: By dissecting the theoretical foundation of reverse litigation on administrative agreements, this paper reveals its connotation and characteristics, and clarifies its position within administrative legal relations. Meanwhile, it conducts a detailed analysis of the practical dilemmas faced in constructing reverse litigation in administrative agreements, including the difficulties in identifying administrative agreements, the constraints of traditional litigation concepts, and the restrictions of the non-litigation enforcement mechanism. Furthermore, it proposes ways to break through these dilemmas, such as clarifying the identification criteria for administrative agreements, changing litigation concepts, and optimizing the non-litigation enforcement mechanism. Based on this, the paper further elaborates on the institutional construction and procedural design of reverse litigation in administrative agreements, covering aspects such as the determination of litigation subject qualifications, the operation of the litigatio
