行政立法中充斥着大量的不确定性法律概念,如何对其界定和解释成为司法实务界和学术界普遍关注的问题,司法实务界关注的是不确定性法律概念与行政裁量权的关联性,而学术界关注的是不确定性法律概念的具体路径。将甘露案作为本文的研究脉络,探讨不确定性法律概念的有关基础知识,通过界定不确定性法律概念的内涵、特征与类型,明确了不同类型的不确定性概念面临的不同具体化困境和相应的优化路径,行政主体和审判机关对同案所涉的不确定性法律概念都享有解释权限,但结论之间可能存在矛盾,针对这一现象,可以从平衡法律适用主体之间利益的角度提出完善路径。The administrative legislation is filled with a large number of uncertain legal concepts, and how to define and interpret them has become a common concern in the judicial and academic fields. The judicial practice field focuses on the correlation between uncertain legal concepts and administrative discretion, while the academic field focuses on the specific path of uncertain legal concepts. Taking the Ganlu case as the research context of this article, we explore the basic knowledge of uncertain legal concepts. By defining the connotation, characteristics, and types of uncertain legal concepts, we clarify the different specific difficulties and corresponding optimization paths faced by different types of uncertain concepts. Both administrative and judicial authorities have the power to interpret uncertain legal concepts involved in the same case, but there may be contradictions between the conclusions. To address this phenomenon, we can propose a path for improvement from the perspective of balancing the interests of legal application subjects.
